Victory in Cayuga Court for CANACE founders


UPDATED 2256 EST Jan 19/08

For many months now CANACE co-founder Jeff Parkinson, with the help of Gary McHale, has been trying to lay criminal charges against two OPP officers who, during an illegal occupation, assisted native protesters in building a barricade to keep the legal owner out of the Hagersville development site.  The Crown has done its level best to make sure the charges were never laid.  

A Justice of the Peace refused to certify the charges despite clear video evidence, the refusal being based on the Crown’s assertion that Parkinson’s motives were suspect, primarily because he was a member of CANACE whose founders have filed various complaints and lawsuits against the OPP. Tomorrow I will post and discuss one important complaint against Fantino and how the government tried to use it against us instead of investigating its shocking allegations.

Despite the Crown’s worst efforts however, on Jan 12/09 Justice Marshall of the Superior Court ruled in Parkinson’s favour in a case now known as ‘Parkinson v. Regina.’ Not only did the judge order a new hearing into the charges, he completely vindicated Parkinson and his motives. This decision will have a huge impact in the ability of all citizens to file private prosecutions against police officers and senior politicians who have breached the law in the performance of their duties. From CANACE’s point of view, it should shut down the outrageous attempts to paint us as ‘vexatious’ filers simply because we have used various democratic means to try to hold politicians and police accountable for abandoning the rule of law.

I have reprinted Gary McHale’s Jan 13/09 column from the Regional News in full below. Readers may want to read his earlier columns and the actual judgement first – they are fascinating reading:


Judge Marshall Rules in Favour of Mandamus


Jan. 13, 2009

The Monday, Jan. 12, 2009 ruling by Judge Marshall regarding Jeff Parkinson’s Order of Mandamus application will be quoted in courts for years to come. NEVER in Canada has anyone been successful in getting a higher court to compel a Justice of the Peace to issue process on criminal charges laid by a private citizen.

The Crown had argued that Judge Marshall could not overrule the decision of a Justice of the Peace who had refused, via her discretionary authority, to issue process on criminal charges laid by Mr. Parkinson against two police officers. People in Haldimand County have heard a lot about the discretionary authority of the OPP and the courts over the past three years and this week’s ruling demonstrates clearly that discretion MUST be exercised in accordance with the Law. In this case even a Justice of the Peace cannot use discretionary authority outside the bounds of the ‘Rule of Law’.

Monday’s court was to focus on whether Judge Marshall had the authority to overrule the discretionary authority of a Justice of the Peace. The Crown had relied heavily upon case law from 1911, 1948, 1969 etc. Mr. Parkinson pointed this out to Judge Marshall and that such case law is prior to the Charter of Rights (1982), prior to Parliament’s Law Reform Commission (1986) and Parliament’s new private prosecution section of the criminal code enacted in 2002. Mr. Parkinson’s main case law consisted of two cases from 2004 which were based on the new enacted code of 2002.

Parliament, in 2002, added to the criminal code the right of every citizen to commence proceedings to COMPEL a justice to issue a summons or warrant. This was exactly what Mr. Parkinson’s Order of Mandamus was requesting.

Mr. Parkinson argued that according to the Law, a Justice of the Peace MUST issue process once there is some evidence that a crime has been committed – Marshall agreed.

Judge Marshall did clear Mr. Pearson, Regional Director of the Crown Office, of any wrongdoing regarding the Crown’s right to cross-examine Mr. Parkinson, but on the other issues related to the actions of the Crown Judge Marshall had set aside those issues to be heard at another date only if this Mandamus was not successful.

The Crown has been trying in various court hearings to paint members of CANACE as people abusing the court system out of ‘animosity’ toward the police. The Justice of the Peace who heard the original evidence during the pre-inquiry agreed with the Crown’s view of Mr. Parkinson.

Judge Marshall did not. In his ruling he states, “…the incriminating evidence… is virtually all in the video of the police helping to erect the barricade. It is hard to see how animosity in the informant could taint the video.” Judge Marshall further stated, “A private prosecution such as this is an important part of the public duty to oversee the administration of justice… We should look – except in the clear case – at public benefit not private demons.”

What are the implications of this ruling?

First, it sends a powerful message to the Crown in Cayuga that any attempts to introduce evidence in a pre-inquiry that may cause a Justice of the Peace not to issue process of the charge will be overruled by the higher court as long as there is evidence a crime has been committed.

Second, it tells the Attorney General of Ontario that the attempt to label members of CANACE (Canadian Advocates for Charter Equality) as being vexatious will not work in court.

Third, it opens the door for any citizen to lay criminal charges against any of the protesters that the OPP refuse to charge, or against any government official including members of the OPP who, through their actions, commit a crime or because of their inaction commit a crime.

The Crown worked hard to ensure that Mr. Parkinson and Mr. McHale were not able to get a Justice of the Peace to issue process of criminal charges because they are well aware that paperwork had already been filed to lay criminal charges against senior OPP officers and a cabinet minister in McGuinty’s government on the charge of Common Nuisance for failing to protect Sam Gaultieri at the Stirling development. The Government had already received paperwork accusing senior OPP officers of Breach of Public Trust.

This ruling by Marshall truly means that if any citizen has evidence that a crime has been committed they will see those charges laid and if not they can use an Order of Mandamus to COMPEL the Justice to issue process.

In the Law Commission’s Report to Parliament in 1986 it states, “Society as a whole is the beneficiary where formal, positive citizen interaction with the justice system results in some additional control over official discretion. Also, the form of retribution which is exacted by the citizen’s resort to legal processes is clearly preferable to other unregulated forms of citizen selfhelp… Finally, it is our belief that this form of citizen/victim participation enhances basic democratic values while at the same [time] it promotes the general image of an effective system of administering justice within the Canadian state.”

Now with Judge Marshall’s ruling the people of Haldimand can finally seek Justice through the court against ‘official discretion’.

Submitted by Gary McHale


VoC Comment

There were a number of Caledonia residents in the court to hear Judge Marshall’s ruling on Jan 12/09. Some had tears in their eyes as we slowly realized that the court was not going to allow the Crown to deny justice to us based on sleazy slurs against the character of those who have acted in the best of faith and democratic traditions.

I urge you to read Judge Marshall’s ruling, especially the part where he talks about the role and motives of reformers in society.

What is delicious about Parkinson v. R. is that it was brought about by two ‘ordinary’ men without formal legal training who went head-to-head with the best lawyers the Attorney General could throw at them…and won!Caledonia owes them both a big debt of gratitude for their persistence in pursuing justice for victims of racial policing.

 The Crown needed to win this case if they had any chance of stopping charges from being filed against senior OPP officers and cabinet ministers. The Crown attorney was overheard telling someone on her cell phone during a break that she thought they were going to win against Parkinson and McHale.

She was wrong.  Thanks to Jeff Parkinson & Gary McHale, the Crown, the OPP and McGuinty’s cabinet are starting to realize there are limits on their ‘discretion’ to enable criminal behaviour against innocent people.

Mark Vandermaas, Editor
Voice of Canada

4 responses to “Victory in Cayuga Court for CANACE founders

  1. Murray Hilton

    Thank you all again; thanks doesn’t cover all the things that have been accomplished by CWUC and Canace officials.

    Everything has got to begin somewhere, the precedent now set by Mr Parkinson along with Mr McHale will be used for a very long time, of course until many more have come along following this Parkinson V Regina, that may also then be used.

    A similar case that comes to minds of many, many thousands of Vancouverites, BCers and other Canadians, is the gross perversion of ‘justice’ resulting from the YVR assult and death of an innocent Polish immigrant in October of 2007. This shamed all three levels of government and not a charge was laid against the bullies that killed this poor innocent man. The RCMP stated they would not take part in the Public Inquiry if any charges were laid against the four assulting RCMP ‘officers’.
    Thanks again for opening up this needed ability to fight crime by the so called ‘crime fighters’.

    Truth Guy, Murray

    VoC Reply: Thanks for writing again TG and for the support. We can win. We are winning. We will win. Regards, Mark

  2. Amazing Article.

    Perhaps from now on the Crown will not be so arrogant as to assume any outcome.

    Sometimes, life throws us a life preserver. In this case victory is sweet. It has been a long, rough road for all of you to get to this place. I hope and pray the rest of the ride is smooth.

    VoC Reply: Hi ML. It’s kind of ironic that the person who has been most vilified with false accusations of illegal behaviour by the OPP is the one who has always acted and spoken and led with the assumption that the system will work if we use it. Gary has been right, all along, about so many things. If there is a lifeline, he is it.

    Of course, an honest judge doesn’t hurt either!

    Thanks for the compliment re the article. The story needed to be told. Regards, Mark

  3. Pingback: Thank you Jeff Parkinson «

  4. Pingback: Gary at Caledonia debate re Six Nations toll road threat: “I’ll have the charges laid within 24 hours.” | Gary McHale for Haldimand Council – Ward 3 (Caledonia)